
violin
Francisco Javier Lupiáñez Ruiz


Luthiers such as Gerrit Menslage, Jan Vos, Hendrik Ravekens, David Kleynman, or Jasper Libbega and Pieter Opperdoes—who were recently discovered in the archives—are all registered as violin makers, but there is still a lack of work that can be definitively attributed to them. This is due to the fact that many original paper labels bearing the maker’s signature or name are no longer present on the instruments. Some have been lost, but many original labels have been replaced with forgeries bearing the names of famous makers such as Amati, Rugeri, Stainer, and Albani.
The Amsterdam School, in particular, has suffered greatly as a result. The design, architectural style, and materials used all indicate that the work must have originated in Amsterdam, but it is impossible to attribute it to a specific architect. This is one of the reasons why finding an original signature can be decisive; an anonymous body of work can suddenly be linked to a specific builder.
On rare occasions, a luthier may have lived only a short time and thus operated a workshop under his own name for just a few years, as was the case with Arent Roelofz van Munster. A violin he made turned up in the United States but has since disappeared again. This is a typical example of why research into the Dutch school is urgently needed.
Based on this idea, the Hendrik Jacobs Foundation was established—a foundation dedicated to restoring the reputation of early Dutch violin makers and their instruments and highlighting their national and international significance. The Musical Instrument Fund recognizes the importance of this research and wholeheartedly supports the initiative of the Hendrik Jacobs Foundation.
D.J. Balfoort, 1931 *Dutch Violin Makers*, H.J. Paris, Amsterdam.
Bolink, J., Giskes, J., Lindeman, F., and Stam, S., 1999, 400 Years of Violin Making in the Netherlands, Amsterdam.
Amsterdam City Archives, accessed in 2025.